News writer, Interviewer
Alabama voters might finally get what they've wanted for decades: a chance to vote on a lottery.
A state senator filed a bill Tuesday that would put the question directly to voters. Should residents authorize an Alabama lottery? What about casinos? Sports betting?
The approach breaks from past gambling proposals. Instead of lawmakers hashing out details, the bill asks voters one simple question: Do you want the Legislature to work on gambling legislation?
If voters say yes, lawmakers would return later to write separate bills spelling out how everything would work. The bill also gives the governor authority to negotiate a compact with the Poarch Band of Creek Indians and establishes a commission to regulate gambling.
The strategy sidesteps the problem that has killed gambling bills for two decades: the details. Legislators get bogged down arguing over specifics. This bill delays those fights until after voters weigh in.
The revenue challenge
Alabama needs additional revenue to support essential services. Budget hearings have exposed shortfalls in social services, Medicaid, and the Department of Human Resources. Federal assistance for food programs and health care is being reduced.
A lottery offers a way to fund services without raising taxes on Alabamians.
Money leaving the state
Alabama is one of five states without a lottery. It's surrounded by states that have them.
Alabamians drive across state lines to buy tickets. That money funds education in Georgia, Tennessee, and Florida instead of staying home.
The issue resonates with voters. Polling shows that upward of 70% of the public wants to vote on a lottery. In some districts, it ranks second only to crime in importance.
The last time Alabama voters had their say was 1999, twenty-five years ago. They rejected the plan by a margin of 54% to 46%.
Political reality
Alabama legislative leaders said before the 2026 session started that a gambling bill likely wouldn't get serious consideration this year. The bill sponsor knew this, but filed anyway to start the conversation.
The bill doesn't specify when voters would see the constitutional amendment on the ballot. That timing will be decided later.
Gambling bills have come up most years. Some got serious consideration. One fell one vote short in 2024.
Addressing opposition
Some Alabamians oppose gambling on moral grounds. Nobody is forcing them to participate. But the revenue question remains: How will the state pay for services as federal funding decreases?
Path forward
The bill needs approval from three-fifths of both the Senate and House to move forward. If it clears the Legislature, it goes to voters. The stripped-down approach might succeed where detailed proposals have failed. Instead of fighting over specifics, lawmakers would simply ask: Should we work on this or not?
The question is whether legislators will have the political courage to let voters decide.
Comments