All news

$1.08B Powerball dispute grows as lottery group moves to dismiss

As legal filings pile up, lottery leaders insist the winner has long been confirmed.

The United States Court House at 312 Spring Street, Los Ángeles, California.
Todd Betzold

Shoppers and lottery watchers are still talking about last summer’s $1.08 billion Powerball drama. A lawsuit was filed in January 2025 claiming the winning ticket belonged to someone else.

The group that runs Powerball wants out of the fight, saying it has no contract with the plaintiff and didn’t sell or verify the ticket.

Why the MUSL wants out, and what that means

The original lawsuit was filed by Stacy Tru. In the lawsuit, she sued the Multi-State Lottery Association and the California Lottery. Tru stated she was the owner of the July 19, 2023, winning Powerball ticket for $1.08B.

The MUSL asked a Los Angeles judge to remove it from the lawsuit, arguing it doesn’t sell tickets or check winners and therefore has no contractual ties to players. That’s a crisp legal position: if you don’t interact with the player, you can’t reasonably be the party that breached an agreement. Readers can picture a quiet, bureaucratic agency shrugging and saying, “Not our kettle of fish.”

The association’s lawyers also point out that the plaintiff has amended her complaint multiple times without adding convincing facts. That’s often a signal to courts that a claim might not have the legal legs to proceed.

For anyone tracking the case, this move narrows the battlefield to the California Lottery and the core issue of ticket ownership.

The viral moment that sparked the frenzy

Footage of the plaintiff celebrating outside the convenience store that sold the ticket went viral the day after the draw, and that footage fueled speculation for months. The public loves an instant celebration, and that one looked like a classic “I won” moment: cameras, cheers, confident claims.

But lottery officials emphasize rules over spectacle: digital hype doesn’t trump possession of the paper ticket. Store family members said they didn’t recognize the woman as a regular.

The confirmed winner, Yanira Alvarez, ultimately presented the original ticket and claimed the prize. It’s a reminder that in these games, drama drives headlines, but the paper trail usually settles the outcome.

What the confirmed winner chose and why it matters

Alvarez elected the one-time lump sum payment, taking $558.1 million before taxes instead of the advertised annuity. For a lot of winners, the lump sum offers immediate access to cash and simpler planning, though it’s typically smaller than the advertised jackpot total because of how annuities and present-value calculations work.

That choice doesn’t affect the legal quarrel over who held the ticket on draw day, but it does close the chapter on who actually collected the money. For people curious about lottery strategy, the financial trade-offs between lump-sum and annuity are familiar: upfront control versus long-term guarantees.

Practical takeaways for players and store owners

If there’s one clear rule here, it’s this: keep the original ticket safe and prove you had it first. That means signing the back where allowed, photographing it, and storing it somewhere secure.

Retailers should keep tight sales records, and customers should resist celebratory moments before the paperwork is done. Legal disputes like this also show the value of immediate, traceable actions after a big win, which would include notarized copies, lawyer consults, and careful public statements.

Hasty interviews and social-media boasts can complicate things, even if they feel celebratory in the moment.

What to watch next

A hearing on MUSL’s request to be dismissed from the case is scheduled for March 17. If they are granted the dismissal, the suit will focus squarely on the California Lottery and the proof of ticket ownership. For the wider public, the case is a neat example of how viral culture and strict administrative rules can collide.

Expect more headline-grabbing moments, but also more legal parsing as the courts decide which parties face which liabilities. It’s a small procedural move that could determine how much attention each agency gets, and whether dramatic livestreams matter in a legal fight.

Enjoy playing the California Lottery, and please remember to play responsibly.

Comments

0
Loading comments

Related articles

A bunch of lottery tickets and scratch-offs spread over a table.
Manifesting a 2025 lottery jackpot: My year chasing the big win

From long shots to record-breaking rollovers, I watched the numbers rise. Was belief enough to change my luck?

Todd Betzold profile pic

Todd Betzold

A hand drawing a graph encompassing multiple years that shows a spike in stats for 2025.
How billion-dollar lottery jackpots quietly supercharge state tax revenue

Recent Powerball and Mega Millions wins show how lottery taxes can shift monthly forecasts.

Todd Betzold profile pic

Todd Betzold

Recent articles

View All
Colorado Lottery Director Tom Seaver.
Featured
Exclusive interview
Rocky Mountain reinvention: Colorado Lottery embarks on transformation

Colorado Lottery Director Tom Seaver reveals the details on new games, retailers, and a digital future.

Samantha Herscher profile pic

Samantha Herscher

The Millionaire for Life logo over a black background with fireworks.
Here are 5 things we love about Millionaire For Life

Millionaire for Life offers higher odds than Powerball and Mega Millions.

Halley Bondy profile pic

Halley Bondy

A bunch of lottery tickets and scratch-offs spread over a table.
Manifesting a 2025 lottery jackpot: My year chasing the big win

From long shots to record-breaking rollovers, I watched the numbers rise. Was belief enough to change my luck?

Todd Betzold profile pic

Todd Betzold

A line of lottery players at a retailer in Italy.
Lottery growth goes digital: $346B expected worldwide in 2026

Convenient mobile play and interactive draws are drawing younger audiences worldwide.

Todd Betzold profile pic

Todd Betzold